Template Method em TypeScript
O Template Method é um padrão de projeto comportamental que permite definir o esqueleto de um algoritmo em uma classe base e permitir que as subclasses substituam as etapas sem alterar a estrutura geral do algoritmo.
Complexidade:
Popularidade:
Exemplos de uso: O padrão Template Method é bastante comum nos frameworks TypeScript. Os desenvolvedores costumam usá-lo para fornecer aos usuários do framework um meio simples de estender a funcionalidade padrão usando herança.
Identificação: O Template Method pode ser reconhecido por métodos comportamentais que já possuem um comportamento “padrão” definido pela classe base.
Exemplo conceitual
Este exemplo ilustra a estrutura do padrão de projeto Template Method. Ele se concentra em responder a estas perguntas:
- De quais classes ele consiste?
- Quais papéis essas classes desempenham?
- De que maneira os elementos do padrão estão relacionados?
index.ts: Exemplo conceitual
/**
* The Abstract Class defines a template method that contains a skeleton of some
* algorithm, composed of calls to (usually) abstract primitive operations.
*
* Concrete subclasses should implement these operations, but leave the template
* method itself intact.
*/
abstract class AbstractClass {
/**
* The template method defines the skeleton of an algorithm.
*/
public templateMethod(): void {
this.baseOperation1();
this.requiredOperations1();
this.baseOperation2();
this.hook1();
this.requiredOperation2();
this.baseOperation3();
this.hook2();
}
/**
* These operations already have implementations.
*/
protected baseOperation1(): void {
console.log('AbstractClass says: I am doing the bulk of the work');
}
protected baseOperation2(): void {
console.log('AbstractClass says: But I let subclasses override some operations');
}
protected baseOperation3(): void {
console.log('AbstractClass says: But I am doing the bulk of the work anyway');
}
/**
* These operations have to be implemented in subclasses.
*/
protected abstract requiredOperations1(): void;
protected abstract requiredOperation2(): void;
/**
* These are "hooks." Subclasses may override them, but it's not mandatory
* since the hooks already have default (but empty) implementation. Hooks
* provide additional extension points in some crucial places of the
* algorithm.
*/
protected hook1(): void { }
protected hook2(): void { }
}
/**
* Concrete classes have to implement all abstract operations of the base class.
* They can also override some operations with a default implementation.
*/
class ConcreteClass1 extends AbstractClass {
protected requiredOperations1(): void {
console.log('ConcreteClass1 says: Implemented Operation1');
}
protected requiredOperation2(): void {
console.log('ConcreteClass1 says: Implemented Operation2');
}
}
/**
* Usually, concrete classes override only a fraction of base class' operations.
*/
class ConcreteClass2 extends AbstractClass {
protected requiredOperations1(): void {
console.log('ConcreteClass2 says: Implemented Operation1');
}
protected requiredOperation2(): void {
console.log('ConcreteClass2 says: Implemented Operation2');
}
protected hook1(): void {
console.log('ConcreteClass2 says: Overridden Hook1');
}
}
/**
* The client code calls the template method to execute the algorithm. Client
* code does not have to know the concrete class of an object it works with, as
* long as it works with objects through the interface of their base class.
*/
function clientCode(abstractClass: AbstractClass) {
// ...
abstractClass.templateMethod();
// ...
}
console.log('Same client code can work with different subclasses:');
clientCode(new ConcreteClass1());
console.log('');
console.log('Same client code can work with different subclasses:');
clientCode(new ConcreteClass2());
Output.txt: Resultados da execução
Same client code can work with different subclasses:
AbstractClass says: I am doing the bulk of the work
ConcreteClass1 says: Implemented Operation1
AbstractClass says: But I let subclasses override some operations
ConcreteClass1 says: Implemented Operation2
AbstractClass says: But I am doing the bulk of the work anyway
Same client code can work with different subclasses:
AbstractClass says: I am doing the bulk of the work
ConcreteClass2 says: Implemented Operation1
AbstractClass says: But I let subclasses override some operations
ConcreteClass2 says: Overridden Hook1
ConcreteClass2 says: Implemented Operation2
AbstractClass says: But I am doing the bulk of the work anyway
