![템플릿 메서드](/images/patterns/cards/template-method-mini.png?id=9f200248d88026d8e79d0f3dae411ab4)
C#으로 작성된 템플릿 메서드
템플릿 메서드는 기초 클래스에서 알고리즘의 골격을 정의할 수 있도록 하는 행동 디자인 패턴입니다. 또 이 패턴은 자식 클래스들이 전체 알고리즘의 구조를 변경하지 않고도 기본 알고리즘의 단계들을 오버라이드할 수 있도록 합니다.
복잡도:
인기도:
사용 사례들: 템플릿 메서드 패턴은 C# 프레임워크들에서 매우 일반적이며 개발자들은 종종 이 패턴을 사용하여 프레임워크 사용자들에게 상속을 사용하여 표준 기능들을 확장하는 간단한 수단을 제공합니다.
식별: 템플릿 메서드는 기초 클래스에 추상적이거나 비어 있는 다른 여러 메서드들을 호출하는 메서드가 있습니다.
개념적인 예시
이 예시는 템플릿 메서드의 구조를 보여주고 다음 질문에 중점을 둡니다:
- 패턴은 어떤 클래스들로 구성되어 있나요?
- 이 클래스들은 어떤 역할을 하나요?
- 패턴의 요소들은 어떻게 서로 연관되어 있나요?
Program.cs: 개념적인 예시
using System;
namespace RefactoringGuru.DesignPatterns.TemplateMethod.Conceptual
{
// The Abstract Class defines a template method that contains a skeleton of
// some algorithm, composed of calls to (usually) abstract primitive
// operations.
//
// Concrete subclasses should implement these operations, but leave the
// template method itself intact.
abstract class AbstractClass
{
// The template method defines the skeleton of an algorithm.
public void TemplateMethod()
{
this.BaseOperation1();
this.RequiredOperations1();
this.BaseOperation2();
this.Hook1();
this.RequiredOperation2();
this.BaseOperation3();
this.Hook2();
}
// These operations already have implementations.
protected void BaseOperation1()
{
Console.WriteLine("AbstractClass says: I am doing the bulk of the work");
}
protected void BaseOperation2()
{
Console.WriteLine("AbstractClass says: But I let subclasses override some operations");
}
protected void BaseOperation3()
{
Console.WriteLine("AbstractClass says: But I am doing the bulk of the work anyway");
}
// These operations have to be implemented in subclasses.
protected abstract void RequiredOperations1();
protected abstract void RequiredOperation2();
// These are "hooks." Subclasses may override them, but it's not
// mandatory since the hooks already have default (but empty)
// implementation. Hooks provide additional extension points in some
// crucial places of the algorithm.
protected virtual void Hook1() { }
protected virtual void Hook2() { }
}
// Concrete classes have to implement all abstract operations of the base
// class. They can also override some operations with a default
// implementation.
class ConcreteClass1 : AbstractClass
{
protected override void RequiredOperations1()
{
Console.WriteLine("ConcreteClass1 says: Implemented Operation1");
}
protected override void RequiredOperation2()
{
Console.WriteLine("ConcreteClass1 says: Implemented Operation2");
}
}
// Usually, concrete classes override only a fraction of base class'
// operations.
class ConcreteClass2 : AbstractClass
{
protected override void RequiredOperations1()
{
Console.WriteLine("ConcreteClass2 says: Implemented Operation1");
}
protected override void RequiredOperation2()
{
Console.WriteLine("ConcreteClass2 says: Implemented Operation2");
}
protected override void Hook1()
{
Console.WriteLine("ConcreteClass2 says: Overridden Hook1");
}
}
class Client
{
// The client code calls the template method to execute the algorithm.
// Client code does not have to know the concrete class of an object it
// works with, as long as it works with objects through the interface of
// their base class.
public static void ClientCode(AbstractClass abstractClass)
{
// ...
abstractClass.TemplateMethod();
// ...
}
}
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Console.WriteLine("Same client code can work with different subclasses:");
Client.ClientCode(new ConcreteClass1());
Console.Write("\n");
Console.WriteLine("Same client code can work with different subclasses:");
Client.ClientCode(new ConcreteClass2());
}
}
}
Output.txt: 실행 결과
Same client code can work with different subclasses:
AbstractClass says: I am doing the bulk of the work
ConcreteClass1 says: Implemented Operation1
AbstractClass says: But I let subclasses override some operations
ConcreteClass1 says: Implemented Operation2
AbstractClass says: But I am doing the bulk of the work anyway
Same client code can work with different subclasses:
AbstractClass says: I am doing the bulk of the work
ConcreteClass2 says: Implemented Operation1
AbstractClass says: But I let subclasses override some operations
ConcreteClass2 says: Overridden Hook1
ConcreteClass2 says: Implemented Operation2
AbstractClass says: But I am doing the bulk of the work anyway