C++로 작성된 책임 연쇄

책임 연쇄 패턴은 핸들러 중 하나가 요청을 처리할 때까지 핸들러들의 체인(사슬)을 따라 요청을 전달할 수 있게 해주는 행동 디자인 패턴입니다.

이 패턴은 발신자 클래스를 수신자들의 구상 클래스들에 연결하지 않고도 여러 객체가 요청을 처리할 수 있도록 합니다. 체인은 표준 핸들러 인터페이스를 따르는 모든 핸들러와 런타임 때 동적으로 구성될 수 있습니다.

책임 연쇄에 대하여 더 자세히 알아보세요

복잡도:

인기도:

사용 예시들: 책임 연쇄 패턴은 C++ 코드에 매우 일반적이며, 당신의 코드가 필터, 이벤터 체인 등과 같은 객체 체인과 함께 작동할 때 특히 유용합니다.

식별: 패턴의 모든 객체는 공통 인터페이스를 따르며, 다른 객체들의 같은 메서드들을 간접적으로 호출하는 한 객체 그룹의 행동 메서드들이 있습니다.

개념적인 예시

이 예시는 책임 연쇄 패턴의 구조를 보여주고 다음 질문에 중점을 둡니다:

패턴은 어떤 클래스들로 구성되어 있나요?
이 클래스들은 어떤 역할을 하나요?
패턴의 요소들은 어떻게 서로 연관되어 있나요?

main.cc: 개념적인 예시

/**
 * The Handler interface declares a method for building the chain of handlers.
 * It also declares a method for executing a request.
 */
class Handler {
 public:
  virtual Handler *SetNext(Handler *handler) = 0;
  virtual std::string Handle(std::string request) = 0;
};
/**
 * The default chaining behavior can be implemented inside a base handler class.
 */
class AbstractHandler : public Handler {
  /**
   * @var Handler
   */
 private:
  Handler *next_handler_;

 public:
  AbstractHandler() : next_handler_(nullptr) {
  }
  Handler *SetNext(Handler *handler) override {
    this->next_handler_ = handler;
    // Returning a handler from here will let us link handlers in a convenient
    // way like this:
    // $monkey->setNext($squirrel)->setNext($dog);
    return handler;
  }
  std::string Handle(std::string request) override {
    if (this->next_handler_) {
      return this->next_handler_->Handle(request);
    }

    return {};
  }
};
/**
 * All Concrete Handlers either handle a request or pass it to the next handler
 * in the chain.
 */
class MonkeyHandler : public AbstractHandler {
 public:
  std::string Handle(std::string request) override {
    if (request == "Banana") {
      return "Monkey: I'll eat the " + request + ".\n";
    } else {
      return AbstractHandler::Handle(request);
    }
  }
};
class SquirrelHandler : public AbstractHandler {
 public:
  std::string Handle(std::string request) override {
    if (request == "Nut") {
      return "Squirrel: I'll eat the " + request + ".\n";
    } else {
      return AbstractHandler::Handle(request);
    }
  }
};
class DogHandler : public AbstractHandler {
 public:
  std::string Handle(std::string request) override {
    if (request == "MeatBall") {
      return "Dog: I'll eat the " + request + ".\n";
    } else {
      return AbstractHandler::Handle(request);
    }
  }
};
/**
 * The client code is usually suited to work with a single handler. In most
 * cases, it is not even aware that the handler is part of a chain.
 */
void ClientCode(Handler &handler) {
  std::vector<std::string> food = {"Nut", "Banana", "Cup of coffee"};
  for (const std::string &f : food) {
    std::cout << "Client: Who wants a " << f << "?\n";
    const std::string result = handler.Handle(f);
    if (!result.empty()) {
      std::cout << "  " << result;
    } else {
      std::cout << "  " << f << " was left untouched.\n";
    }
  }
}
/**
 * The other part of the client code constructs the actual chain.
 */
int main() {
  MonkeyHandler *monkey = new MonkeyHandler;
  SquirrelHandler *squirrel = new SquirrelHandler;
  DogHandler *dog = new DogHandler;
  monkey->SetNext(squirrel)->SetNext(dog);

  /**
   * The client should be able to send a request to any handler, not just the
   * first one in the chain.
   */
  std::cout << "Chain: Monkey > Squirrel > Dog\n\n";
  ClientCode(*monkey);
  std::cout << "\n";
  std::cout << "Subchain: Squirrel > Dog\n\n";
  ClientCode(*squirrel);

  delete monkey;
  delete squirrel;
  delete dog;

  return 0;
}

Output.txt: 실행 결과

Chain: Monkey > Squirrel > Dog

Client: Who wants a Nut?
  Squirrel: I'll eat the Nut.
Client: Who wants a Banana?
  Monkey: I'll eat the Banana.
Client: Who wants a Cup of coffee?
  Cup of coffee was left untouched.

Subchain: Squirrel > Dog

Client: Who wants a Nut?
  Squirrel: I'll eat the Nut.
Client: Who wants a Banana?
  Banana was left untouched.
Client: Who wants a Cup of coffee?
  Cup of coffee was left untouched.