This article will show the difference between:
- Creation method
- Static creation (or factory) method
- Simple factory
- Factory Method
- Abstract Factory
You can find references to these terms all around the web. Though they may look similar, they all have different meanings. A lot of people don't realize that, which leads to confusion and misunderstanding.
So let's try to figure out the difference and solve this problem once and for all.
Factory is an ambiguous term that stands for a function, method or class that supposed to be producing something. Most commonly, factories produce objects. But they may also produce files, records in databases, etc.
For instance, any of these things may be casually referenced as a "factory":
- a function or method that creates program's GUI;
- a class that creates users;
- static method that calls a class constructor in a certain way;
- one of the creational design patterns.
Usually, when someone says a word "factory," the exact meaning is supposed to be clear from a context. But if you're in doubt, just ask. There's a chance that the author is ignorant.
#2. Creation method
Creation method defined in the Refactoring To Patterns book as "a method that creates objects." This means that every result of a factory method pattern is a "creation method" but not necessarily the reverse. It also means that you can substitute the term "creation method" wherever Martin Fowler uses the term “factory method” in Refactoring and wherever Joshua Bloch uses the term “static factory method” in Effective Java.
In reality, creation method is just a wrapper around a constructor call. It may just have a name that better expresses your intentions. On the other hand, it may help to isolate your code from changes to the constructor. It could even contain some particular logic that would return existing objects instead of creating new.
A lot of people would call such methods "factory method" just because it produces new objects: The logic is straightforward: the method creates objects and since all factories creates objects, this method should clearly be a factory method. Naturally, there is a lot of confusion when it comes to the real Factory Method pattern.
In the following example,
next is a creation method:
#3. Static creation method
Static creation method is a creation method declared as
static. In other words, it can be called on a class and doesn't require an object to be created.
Don't be confused when someone calls methods like this a "static factory method". That's just a bad habit. The Factory Method is a design pattern that relies on inheritance. If you make it
static, you can no longer extend it in subclasses, which defeats the purpose of the pattern.
When a static creation method returns new objects it becomes an alternative constructor.
It might be useful when:
You have to have several different constructors that have different purposes but their signatures match. For instance, having both
Random(int min)is impossible in Java, C++, C# and many other languages. And most popular workaround is to create several static methods that call default constructor and set appropriate values afterward.
You want to reuse existing objects, instead of instancing new ones (see, Singleton pattern). Constructors in most programming languages have to return new class instances. The static creation method is a workaround to this limitation. Inside a static method, your code can decide whether to create a fresh instance by calling the constructor or return an existing object from some cache.
In the following example, the
load method is a static factory method. It provides a convenient way to retrieve users from a database.
#4. Simple factory pattern
The Simple factory pattern describes a class that has one creation method with a large conditional that based on method parameters chooses which product class to instantiate and then return.
People usually confuse simple factories with a general factories or with one of the creational design patterns. In most cases, a simple factory is an intermediate step of introducing Factory Method or Abstract Factory patterns.
Simple factories usually don't have subclasses. But after extracting subclasses from a simple factory, it starts to look like a classic factory method pattern.
By the way, if you declare simple factory
abstract, it does not magically become the abstract factory pattern.
Here's an example of simple factory:
#5. Factory Method pattern
The Factory Method is a creational design pattern that provides an interface for creating objects but allows subclasses to alter the type of an object that will be created.
If you have a creation method in base class and subclasses that extend it, you might be looking at the factory method.
#6. Abstract Factory pattern
The Abstract Factory is a creational design pattern that allows producing families of related or dependent objects without specifying their concrete classes.
What are the "families of objects"? For instance, take this set of classes:
Controls. There are might be several variants of these:
If your program does not operate with product families, then you don't need an abstract factory.
And again, a lot of people mix-up the abstract factory pattern with a simple factory class declared as
abstract. Don't do that!
Now that you know the difference, take a fresh look at the design patterns: